Comments on: Interaction Equivalency Site Announcement http://terrya.edublogs.org/2011/08/30/interaction-equivalency-site-announcement/ Teaching and Learning in a Net-Centric World Tue, 16 Apr 2013 14:21:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://edublogs.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Terumi Miyazoe http://terrya.edublogs.org/2011/08/30/interaction-equivalency-site-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-1898 Terumi Miyazoe Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:45:43 +0000 http://terrya.edublogs.org/2011/08/30/#comment-1898 Hi Norm,

Welcome and could we probably discuss about your question at EQuiv website: Sharing Ideas space – I’m very interested in your point!

Terumi :)

]]> By: Norm Friesen http://terrya.edublogs.org/2011/08/30/interaction-equivalency-site-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-1897 Norm Friesen Tue, 30 Aug 2011 23:10:53 +0000 http://terrya.edublogs.org/2011/08/30/#comment-1897 Just some quick thoughts:

A theorem is something that has been proven on the basis of already proven axioms and/or other theorems.

In Popper’s and other’s terms, the “equivalency theorem” would be an equivalency hypothesis.

Following Popper further, to be subject to falsification, such a hypothesis needs actually to be falsifiable.

Additionally, a hypothesis is only falsifiable when “some observation or experiment will produce a *reproducible result* that is in conflict with it.” (Wikipedia)

What are the conditions for reproducibility in different classes using different combinations of interactions?

]]>