<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Naming aggregations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terrya.edublogs.org/2007/11/23/naming-aggregations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terrya.edublogs.org/2007/11/23/naming-aggregations/</link>
	<description>Teaching and Learning in a Net-Centric World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:20:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Snowden</title>
		<link>http://terrya.edublogs.org/2007/11/23/naming-aggregations/comment-page-1/#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Snowden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrya.edublogs.org/2007/11/23/naming-aggregations/#comment-1399</guid>
		<description>I think you have substantially missed the point on crews (there is no possible equivalence in a class room) and I also think your three fold distinction is confusing in its use of language.  I have blogged on that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2007/11/are_you_on_the_bully_watch.php#more&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  Its is an interesting debate however, thanks for picking it up even though I disagree with you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have substantially missed the point on crews (there is no possible equivalence in a class room) and I also think your three fold distinction is confusing in its use of language.  I have blogged on that <a href="http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2007/11/are_you_on_the_bully_watch.php#more" rel="nofollow">here</a>.  Its is an interesting debate however, thanks for picking it up even though I disagree with you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
